The agent reached the homepage, admissions page and our-story page by following in-site links and produced a detailed, mostly grounded explanation of programs, fees, scholarships and eligibility. It could not confirm accreditation, the current admissions cycle, or any competitor comparison, and the FAQ answers failed to load, so the task was only partially met.

• ›The admissions page published a complete, structured fee schedule, hostel fee and eligibility list, which let the agent answer pricing directly from site content.
• ›Application round dates on the admissions page (ending 2025–26) conflicted with the homepage's claim that 2026 admissions are open, leaving the current cycle unverifiable.
• ›Accreditation status (UGC/AICTE/NAAC) was absent from the homepage and our-story page; the agent had to defer to mandatory disclosures and NIRF PDFs it did not open.
• ›The homepage FAQ section rendered without answers, a machine-readability gap that removed a likely source of direct answers.
• ›The site makes no comparison to alternatives, so the 'how it differs' portion rests entirely on self-description and self-reported placement figures.