The agent successfully gathered a complete high-level picture of FeebiX by fetching three core pages (homepage, about, launch-status), assembling answers to all four task questions from site-published content. The site was navigable via linked menus, but deliberately pre-launch and thin on operational detail (no pricing, no launch date, contradictory payment language), so the agent had to surface gaps and caveats rather than fill them from model memory.

• ›All three fetched pages were content-bearing and directly authored by FeebiX; the agent followed links from the homepage navigation rather than guessing URLs, demonstrating the site's discoverability.
• ›Pricing section relies entirely on absence: the agent correctly reported that no fees, commissions, or payment model are published anywhere on the three pages fetched, and the launch-status page only mentions 'fee settlement' as a future feature without definition.
• ›The agent explicitly noted contradictions within the site's own content (homepage vs. launch-status wording on payment handling) and UI artifacts ('Checking your account…', blank 'Switch to ?' dialog), indicating these are real site issues rather than agent hallucination.
• ›The agent acknowledged its own limited scope—it fetched 3 of 10+ linked pages (skipped /for-customers, /for-providers, /services, /policies)—and did not claim completeness, grounding the caveat in its own navigation choices rather than site failures.
• ›Service area count mismatch (12 claimed, ~6 shown on homepage, CV Creation only in footer) was surfaced by the agent from raw page content, demonstrating the site publishes inconsistent information rather than hiding it.