The agent assembled a partial but coherent explanation of MiLB.com's purpose, audience, and content by combining homepage inspection, news pages, web search results about MLB.TV pricing, and prior knowledge about minor league baseball structure. However, the agent could not definitively answer the pricing question because the site itself redirects subscription flows to MLB.TV's billing infrastructure rather than displaying standalone MiLB.TV pricing transparently—forcing reliance on external sources and educated inference rather than site-native information.

• ›Step [1] (homepage) and steps [4–5] (about, TV pages) returned high-level positioning but no pricing or detailed feature comparisons—the site presents MiLB.com as a news/stats hub, not a standalone product with its own billing.
• ›Step [10] confirmed the redirection: the /live-stream-games/subscribe URL redirects to MLB.TV's paywall (MLB.com domain), not a MiLB.com-hosted subscription page, breaking the agent's ability to discover pricing from the primary domain.
• ›Steps [7], [16], [17], [23] (web searches) surfaced external sources mentioning historical MiLB.TV pricing ($39.99–$49.99 seasonal) and current MLB.TV bundles, but the agent had to note these as *external* findings, not site-native facts.
• ›The site offers no dedicated FAQ, pricing comparison table, or feature matrix on milb.com itself—content is fragmented across milb.com (news, schedules, stats) and MLB.com/milb (broader context) and mlb.com (billing).
• ›The agent's final answer correctly identifies the core product (prospect development content + game streaming) but flagged the pricing structure as 'confusing and inconsistent,' accurately reflecting a genuine site-design gap rather than agent confusion.