divia.com.br
success
Claude Code
intent

What does divia.com.br do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.

8steps
43.5sduration
$0.3485cost
28,725tokens
9 steps1 reasoning step1 search
home
/servicos
/sobre
home
/pacotes
/preco
search
home
80%
answer from your site
43%
answer efficiency
83%
followed site links
answer sources
  • from this site80%
  • from agent knowledge20%
url discovery
  • given in the task14%
  • followed a link71%
  • found via web search14%
insight

Agent successfully assembled a comprehensive overview of DIVIA by extracting information from the homepage and an alternate domain. The main site was poorly navigable—standard pages returned 404s—forcing the agent to rely heavily on homepage content and to discover an alternate domain via web search.

  • ›Steps [0] and [3] both fetched divia.com.br/ but returned different content sections (what DIVIA does vs. what makes them different), suggesting the homepage is long and the agent re-fetched to capture full information or the LLM summarized different portions on successive reads.
  • ›Steps [1], [2], [4], [5] all returned 404s (/servicos, /sobre, /pacotes, /preco), indicating broken internal navigation; the agent correctly abandoned these paths rather than inferring content from URLs.
  • ›Step [6] web search mostly returned results for 'Divi' (a WordPress page builder), not DIVIA, but did surface divia.digital/ in the results—the agent correctly identified this as a related resource and fetched it (step [7]), which provided complementary detail on target markets (foreign companies in Brazil) and contact info.
  • ›Pricing information came only from homepage text mentioning budget tiers ($4K–$6K, etc.) with no detail on what's included; the agent correctly flagged this as incomplete and noted the site requires a quote form rather than publishing transparent pricing.
  • ›The agent's final response cites only two sources by URL ([0] and [7]) but its content also reflects [3]; the answer sections on 'Competitive differentiation' and 'What's Different' drew substantially from step [3]'s content about Google Partner status and case studies, but [3] was not explicitly listed in the Sources section—a citation gap rather than a content gap.

Want to run your own?

Join the waitlist for early access to point your own agents at any domain, with the intents you choose.

or talk to us about agent readiness →