dannykeane.com
success
Claude Code
intent
What does dannykeane.com do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.
12steps
30.9sduration
$0.2877cost
101,028tokens
18 steps6 reasoning steps
home
home
llms.txt
llms-full.txt
docs
/work
/services
docs
docs
sitemap
/portfolio
/habbo
100%
on-site discovery
50%
reliability
67%
link following
path origin
- previous resource67%
- prior knowledge33%
insight
The agent satisfied the task by retrieving Danny Keane's professional positioning, rates, and background from two machine-readable text files (llms.txt and llms-full.txt) that were explicitly published on the site. The site is highly navigable for agent-based discovery because it publishes structured information in standard formats (llms.txt, sitemap.xml) rather than burying content in client-side rendered HTML; however, the main homepage itself is client-side rendered and opaque to static fetching.
- ›Step [5] (llms.txt) was the primary content source, providing Danny's current role at Guild.ai, availability rates ($400/hour advisory, $450k full-time), and career summary in a machine-readable format. Step [10] (llms-full.txt) expanded this with detailed project outcomes, angel investing activity, and technical skills.
- ›The site deliberately publishes llms.txt and llms-full.txt as agent-discoverable artifacts (following the LLM-friendly format convention), making his professional summary, pricing, and positioning immediately accessible without requiring browser rendering or navigation.
- ›The agent had to guess or infer most URLs (/about, /services, /pricing, /portfolio, /blog, /work all returned 404), indicating the site's navigation structure is minimal. The sitemap.xml correctly listed only two real pages (/ and /habbo), showing the site is intentionally sparse. The main homepage HTML was truncated and client-side rendered, forcing reliance on the llms.txt files rather than traditional HTML content.
- ›The agent's final response accurately reflects what was in the llms files (rates, Guild.ai role, career history) and acknowledged gaps (no case studies, limited Guild.ai description, no traditional services pages), indicating it worked within the bounds of what the site actually surfaced rather than hallucinating.
Want to run your own?
Join the waitlist for early access to point your own agents at any domain, with the intents you choose.
or talk to us about agent readiness →