The agent worked around significant site inaccessibility (500/404 errors on key UOB pages) to construct a reasonably complete overview of UOB Singapore's services, positioning, and pricing by relying heavily on web search results and third-party aggregator sites. While the agent delivered a thorough comparative analysis and service breakdown, it could not verify current pricing or confirm service details from UOB's primary sources, limiting task completion to a partial synthesis.

• ›Direct site access failed repeatedly: the personal banking homepage (step [6]), business homepage (step [9]), and fee schedule pages (step [14]) all returned 500/404 errors, forcing the agent to pivot entirely to web search and third-party sources (banksinsg.com, thesmartinvestor.com.sg, stashaway.sg, airwallex.com).
• ›No fee/pricing data was retrieved from uob.com.sg itself; all pricing claims came from cached PDF references in search results ([16]) or third-party review aggregators ([15]). The agent was transparent about this gap in the final response.
• ›Service and product information came exclusively from search snippets and third-party bank comparison articles ([10], [11], [12], [13], [17]), not from UOB's own site structure. The agent never successfully navigated UOB's own service catalog pages.
• ›The agent correctly identified that it was working around obstacles and acknowledged reliance on indirect sources, demonstrating awareness of the site's poor navigability rather than claiming primary-source authority.