The agent assembled a partial but substantive explanation of HousingFeed from three published pages (homepage, pricing, terms). Pricing lacks concrete numbers, trial timing has internal contradictions on the site, and competitive positioning is absent — gaps the site itself does not resolve.

• ›The homepage and pricing page publish no fee amounts, currency, or rate structure; pricing is fully custom-quote-only, which the agent correctly reported but could not resolve further without contacting sales.
• ›The Display Feed licence terms were explicitly fetchable and clearly restrict use (no resale, no ML training, source attribution mandatory), but the homepage does not surface this distinction clearly — the agent had to fetch a separate page to understand product boundaries.
• ›Trial timing contains an internal contradiction on the site itself: the FAQ (homepage) says either party can end 'with immediate effect' during the free period, while the pricing page states '30 days' notice' is required. The agent surfaced this as unresolved rather than guessing.
• ›The site links to /coverage, /docs, /how-listings-are-verified, and other pages but the agent did not fetch them; critical schema, verification details, and market coverage remain unconfirmed — the site structure invites deeper inspection but the agent stopped at the core three pages.
• ›No competitor comparison, company About page, or FAQ (beyond homepage snippet) exists on the site; the agent correctly identified these gaps rather than filling them from model memory.