The agent successfully reconstructed Credit Suisse's business model and positioning, but had to work around a dead website: credit-suisse.com redirects to UBS, so the agent relied entirely on search results, third-party summaries, and Wikipedia to answer. The site itself was not navigable for this task.

• ›The target domain (credit-suisse.com) was non-navigable: it immediately redirected to ubs.com with no historical or informational content, forcing the agent to discover all answers via web search (75% of URLs from search results) rather than direct site exploration.
• ›Step [1] (web search for 'Credit Suisse acquisition UBS') and Step [4] (web search for 'Credit Suisse business model services') provided the bulk of structured business information through search snippets, not full-page fetches—the agent synthesized fragmented data.
• ›Step [5] (Wikipedia fetch) was the only third-party full-page source that returned complete, structured content about Credit Suisse's divisions, historical positioning, and competitive differentiation; it became a primary factual anchor.
• ›Pricing details could not be retrieved from any source—the agent correctly flagged this as missing and inferred a general fee model (AUM percentage, trading commissions) based on banking industry conventions rather than Credit Suisse's own published rates.
• ›The agent explicitly called out what it could not find (reasons for failure, direct competitor pricing comparison, specific fee structures) and correctly attributed those gaps to source limitations rather than claiming knowledge it did not retrieve.