Agent successfully retrieved and synthesized core information about the firm's services, target audience, pricing model, and differentiation from the homepage and contact page. The site publishes most required facts directly, but defers pricing to consultation and breaks some navigation (FAQ 404), forcing the agent to reconstruct content from what was accessible.

• ›Pricing is entirely deferred—no fee ranges, hourly rates, or first-consultation costs are published anywhere on the site. The agent had to report this absence transparently rather than guess.
• ›The homepage refers to an FAQ section, but /faq returned 404; the agent discovered this broken link and acknowledged it rather than hallucinating FAQ content.
• ›The site was navigated primarily by the agent typing URLs from memory (67%) rather than following visible links, suggesting weak information architecture or navigation signposting.
• ›The lawyer's prior employment (prosecutor's office, traffic court, city attorney) is the main differentiator the site claims, but no comparative analysis with competitors is provided on-site; the agent correctly flagged this and did not invent comparisons.
• ›Contact form and FAQ fragments were retrieved, but structured metadata (schema.org, JSON-LD) or machine-readable service catalogs appear absent, requiring the agent to extract and categorize services from prose sections.