The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive overview of SEEK.com.au by working around direct site access (blocked by Cloudflare) and relying on web search results and third-party review/comparison sites. The final answer covers what SEEK does, who it's for, pricing models, and competitive differentiation, though some details (premium vs. standard features, tiered packages, subsidiary offerings) remained incomplete or unverified because the agent could not fetch SEEK's primary pages directly.

• ›Step [6] (au.seek.com/about) was fetched successfully but the response HTML was truncated and did not yield extractable content in the trajectory; the agent relied primarily on secondary sources (steps [7], [9], [11], [12]) for substantive details about SEEK's business model, pricing, and competitors.
• ›Steps [7] and [9] were third-party review/guide pages (BetterTeam, 11recruitment.com.au) that explicitly documented SEEK's pricing structure ($275–$695 per job, dynamic pricing factors, pre-paid ad budgets) and employer positioning — information not directly accessible from SEEK's own blocked homepage.
• ›Step [11] and [12] web searches surfaced comparison articles and business model analyses that grounded the agent's claims about SEEK's market dominance (90% time-on-site), revenue (~A$1.1 billion), and differentiation from Indeed/Jora/LinkedIn; these were cited in the final response sources.
• ›The agent was unable to fetch SEEK's primary pricing or employer dashboard pages (initial direct fetch returned 403; later `au.seek.com/about` truncated), forcing reliance on aggregated third-party analysis rather than authoritative source material.
• ›Site agent-readiness is poor: Cloudflare blocking prevented direct inspection of core pages; no structured data (schema.org, JSON-LD) or machine-readable pricing was accessible; the agent had to synthesize information from external review sites, limiting confidence in details like exact feature breakdowns and tiered packages.