The agent successfully gathered enough information to explain what Cyberkov does, who they serve, and how they differ from competitors, but encountered a significant gap: Cyberkov does not publish pricing information on their website. The agent accessed markdown/text artifact files (llms-full.txt and index.md) that contained detailed service catalogs and company positioning, making the site reasonably agent-friendly for discovery and identity but opaque for cost evaluation.

• ›Steps [7] and [8] returned structured markdown documents (llms-full.txt and index.md) that were the actual content source—not the HTML homepage. The agent had to probe for these artifacts rather than extract information from normal web pages, suggesting the site relies on pre-rendered markdown for machine readability.
• ›The agent correctly identified that /pricing returns a 404 (step [5]), and web search (step [10]) yielded no pricing data from external sources either. This is a genuine gap in the site's information architecture, not a navigation failure—Cyberkov appears to intentionally withhold pricing.
• ›The site surfaces its core identity (what it does, who it serves, certifications, geographic focus) well via machine-readable text files, but fails on the commercial/transactional layer. An agent or human evaluator cannot determine cost without contacting sales directly.
• ›The agent successfully differentiated Cyberkov from competitors (dual cyber + signal security discipline, TSCM/counter-espionage services, dual SOC model, government-grade credentials) using content from the artifacts, showing the site does communicate positioning—but only to agents willing to parse markdown files.