The agent successfully gathered a comprehensive overview of 42 Angoulême by fetching the homepage and FAQ, discovering most core claims directly from site content. The site surfaces its core value proposition and admissions process clearly but leaves gaps on employment outcomes, living costs, and credential market value that the agent correctly flagged as absent.

• ›The homepage (step [0]) contained the core positioning (free, no teachers, project-based, peer learning, video-game-like progression) and admissions outline, but only as prose without structured metadata, requiring the agent to synthesize.
• ›The FAQ (step [1]) was the primary source for credential details (RNCP levels 6 and 7), time commitment specifics (3-year plan, blackhole credit system, freeze allowances), and Piscine structure (26 consecutive days, selection criteria, maximum two attempts). This page was critical and well-organized for answering the 'how it works' and 'what you get' questions.
• ›Age and eligibility rules were scattered across steps with minor contradictions (18+ or 16 with bac on homepage vs. piscine-specific rules in FAQ), which the agent caught and flagged—the site did not normalize these definitions.
• ›Key claims lacking sourcing (4.5/5 employer satisfaction, 25,000 learners network size) were present on the homepage but without methodology or links; the agent noted this limitation without overstating the numbers as facts.
• ›The site does not publish employment rates, job placement data, completion statistics, or living cost information; the agent correctly identified these absences rather than inferring from model memory, maintaining fidelity to what was actually retrievable.