The agent read the homepage and FAQ to understand EcoCompare's core offering—a free quote-comparison tool for Belgian homeowners—but could not fully explain how it works, who runs it, or how it's funded, because methodological, legal, and financial details were behind unvisited links. The site is navigable but deliberately distributes critical information across multiple pages, forcing the agent to either guess or leave gaps.

• ›The homepage and FAQ both explicitly link to 'Comment ça marche' and 'Comment fonctionne notre analyse ?' without displaying the methodology inline; the agent noted but did not fetch these pages, leaving a core claim—how quotes are actually compared—unverified and unexplainable to others.
• ›The site claims independence and security ('plateforme sécurisée & indépendante') but does not disclose its funding model or any partnerships with contractors; the business model question is foundational to the independence claim and was not answered by the fetched pages.
• ›Legal notices and privacy policy are linked but not fetched; company identity, data handling, and retention policies remain undisclosed in what the agent actually read, forcing reliance on model memory to flag these gaps rather than ground them in retrieved failures.
• ›Both fetched pages are in French with no language-switcher or English alternative visible; no geographic or coverage limits are mentioned despite claims to serve 'Belgium,' suggesting the site does not pre-emptively clarify scope.
• ›The agent typed both URLs from memory (not discovered via navigation or search), indicating the site does not surface internal structure via sitemaps, breadcrumbs, or internal linking patterns; the agent had to guess the FAQ location.