The agent gathered a complete, well-structured explanation of Haven Tents' business model, pricing, and claimed differentiators by fetching the homepage and the company's own comparison page. The site's own pages provided most facts, but lacked transparency on shipping costs, kit contents for "From" prices, patent claims, and test data behind comfort assertions—gaps the agent explicitly called out rather than filling from memory.

• ›The homepage contained comprehensive product lineup, pricing, positioning, and differentiators in a single fetch; the agent supplemented this with the dedicated comparison page (discovered via site navigation), which quantified advantages and admitted limitations in Haven's own language—both sources site-native.
• ›The agent correctly identified and reported unresolved ambiguities: 'From' prices without variant clarity, the Spectre weight baseline missing, Safari vs. XL functional differences unexplained, and shipping costs absent—these are gaps in site clarity, not agent failures, and the response properly signals them.
• ›Claims lacking evidentiary support (pressure relief, durability, warmth parity, patent) were extracted from the site's own assertions and flagged as unverified; the agent did not fill these gaps with model memory or external sources, maintaining epistemic honesty.
• ›The site published structured product data, pricing, and customer positioning across its main pages; no hidden APIs, paywalls, or authentication blocked access—the site was fully navigable and transparent in what it chose to expose.
• ›The agent discovered all content-bearing pages via site-native links (homepage → comparison page via 'Haven vs Ground Tents' link), demonstrating the site's discoverability; no search or URL guessing was needed beyond the initial domain entry.