Agent successfully assembled a comprehensive explanation of Lens Proof Check by fetching the homepage, about page, and pricing document. The site publishes its core functionality, use cases, and free-tier pricing directly; the agent located and cited all primary sources. Gaps remain on full feature comparisons, exact trial duration, PPP pricing territories, and batch-vs-single-file limit clarification, but the agent explicitly flagged these as missing rather than speculating.

• ›The homepage (step [0]) and about page (step [1]) both returned well-structured, direct descriptions of what the tool does, who it's for, and that it's free—sufficient to answer the core task without external search.
• ›Pricing for the Lens Proof app required fetching an external-domain resource (lensproof.app/llms.txt, step [2]) that the homepage explicitly pointed to; the site does not embed app pricing on the validator's own domain, creating a two-domain navigation requirement.
• ›The agent correctly identified a privacy-usability tension: the 'nothing is uploaded' messaging applies only to standard validation, while the optional Explain Credentials feature sends sensitive data to Vercel AI Gateway—this nuance was present in the fetched content but easily missed.
• ›No named competitors or comparative claims appear on the site; the agent noted this explicitly rather than filling the gap with model memory, maintaining fidelity to what the site actually surfaces.
• ›The site publishes structured product information (verdicts, file types, limits, tiers) but lacks an FAQ, docs, or pricing details page; the agent traced this fragmentation and cited available pages (changelog, about, privacy, contact) while acknowledging what was absent.