The agent assembled a partial answer from the homepage and community overview, but could not access the docs to verify claims or find pricing/license details. The site exposed what ReScript does and who it targets, but failed to document pricing, licensing, or competitive positioning—requiring the agent to acknowledge reliance on external knowledge (MIT license) and to note that any "how it's different" assessment requires sources outside the site.

• ›The homepage (step [0]) was the primary content source, containing all substantive facts about ReScript's features, tooling, and target audience. The agent fetched it by typing the URL from memory, not via a site-surfaced link, suggesting poor discoverability within the site itself.
• ›Pricing and licensing were completely absent from both the homepage and community page (step [3]). The agent explicitly noted this gap and disclosed reliance on external knowledge (MIT license) rather than inventing answers, but had to qualify it as unverified on the site.
• ›Two attempts to access the docs (steps [2] and [5]) failed with 404s, blocking access to deeper product information and comparison content. The agent correctly identified that it could not answer the 'how it's different' part of the task from site content alone.
• ›The community page (step [3]) did not explain what the 'ReScript Association' is, despite listing it as a footer link. This left a key organizational detail unresolved even after fetching a dedicated community page.
• ›The agent did not explore the blog, packages, playground (`/try`), or templates, reducing coverage of the product's day-to-day use and ecosystem. These were surfaced on the homepage but not followed, limiting the answer's completeness.