The agent successfully gathered comprehensive information about Zoí Mídia's offerings, pricing, and positioning by fetching the homepage and plans page. The site is navigable and pricing is available on the dedicated plans page, though key details like differentiators lack substantiation and the engagement model distinction remains conceptually blurry.

• ›Pricing was accessible but required a second page fetch; the homepage provided no rates, forcing visitors to navigate to /planos/ to understand costs.
• ›The site published concrete pricing in tabular form (three managed plans at R$200/350/700/month plus two hosting tiers), but neither page contained competitor comparisons, case studies, or performance guarantees to back the claimed differentiators.
• ›The distinction between Assessoria (full service) and Consultoria (advisory) was described in overlapping language on the homepage, and the plans page did not clarify which model each tier belonged to, creating ambiguity about what a customer actually buys.
• ›Homepage keyword lists (e.g., 'EAD,' 'Identidade visual,' 'Monitoramento 24h') were unexplained on both pages fetched; plan feature asterisks referenced licensing conditions not traced, indicating incomplete transparency.
• ›The agent correctly identified gaps (no About, team, location, contract length, downgrade guarantees beyond the six-month clawback) and acknowledged it had not fetched the contact page, setting appropriate boundaries on its answer.