The agent successfully retrieved the core facts about Ozzi's products, pricing, and refund policies from three public pages (homepage, capsule product page, refund policy), but had to flag numerous inconsistencies, vague refund terms, and missing ingredient-level disclosure that the site itself did not clarify. The site was navigable via links and straightforward URLs, though the final answer relies on the agent acknowledging gaps it could not fill from what was fetched.

• ›Pricing and savings figures conflict within the same page sections (e.g., 'Save 46% for Life' vs. 'Save $0/Month' and 'Save $10/Month' on the bundle), indicating incomplete or auto-generated content on the site itself.
• ›Proprietary blend ingredients are not itemized by dose — the agent correctly identified this as a missing disclosure rather than a retrieval failure, since the fetched capsule product page explicitly states '1.15 g' without breaking down chromium or sub-ingredients.
• ›The refund policy page left key overlaps and application rules unstated (whether $7 fee applies to challenge refunds, how 14 consecutive days are verified, how bundle refunds count as 'one item'), forcing the agent to flag these as genuine gaps rather than claim answers from model memory.
• ›The agent did not fetch the FAQ or ingredients pages, which were linked from the homepage but the agent chose to construct its answer from the three pages it did fetch — a reasonable scope decision that left some depth questions unresolved, but the agent transparently noted this limitation.
• ›The site's API and 'For AI Agents' documentation links in the footer were irrelevant to the shopping task, and the agent correctly identified this as extraneous rather than substantive, indicating the site's navigation surface was partially polluted.