Agent successfully gathered core positioning, process, and differentiators from the site's main pages. Site was navigable but opaque on pricing, proof of work, and technical details; agent identified gaps clearly and did not fill them with unsupported claims.

• ›The site publishes a clear four-step process (intro → scan → build → measure) and stated principles (human review, EU data handling, AI Act alignment), all sourced from fetched pages.
• ›Pricing is genuinely absent: no tiers, ranges, or even typical project costs published anywhere on the fetched pages. Agent correctly reported this as missing rather than guessing.
• ›No case studies, client names, or team member bios appear on the About page—only generic claims about independence and plain language. Site offers no evidence of past outcomes.
• ›The Live scan tool has no transparent scoring criteria or AI model naming; only the homepage is measured. Agent correctly flagged unclear methodology rather than inventing detail.
• ›All four fetched pages were content-bearing and cited in the final response, indicating the agent's answer is grounded entirely in site content; no model memory was used to fill domain facts.