The agent read only the homepage and produced a clear, well-grounded explanation of Código 360's services, audience, pricing approach, and roadmap, while honestly flagging gaps. The homepage carried nearly all the needed content in one fetchable response, but sector, service, and FAQ subpages were never opened, so the answer is incomplete.

• ›The homepage alone exposed services, audience, pricing policy, differentiators, and the roadmap in a single fetchable page, making the core explanation straightforward to assemble.
• ›Pricing is not published anywhere the agent reached; the site only promises a free conversation and a written quote, which the agent correctly reported as missing rather than inventing figures.
• ›Sector and service detail pages and the FAQ were linked but never fetched, so claims about their depth remain unverified.
• ›Claims of savings and quick-win returns are unsupported by any case studies or figures on the page, a credibility gap the agent flagged.
• ›The 'how it's different from alternatives' part could only reflect the company's self-description; no competitor content was retrieved, so the comparison was not independently grounded.