Agent assembled a solid overview of Incite's services, target market, and positioning from repeated fetches of the homepage, but encountered deliberate opacity around pricing and complete absence of team/case information on the public site. The site is moderately agent-friendly for its core pitch but requires a contact form submission to advance beyond surface-level discovery.

• ›All content came from the homepage fetched 3 times (steps [0], [1], [2]); the agent relied entirely on memory-typed URL entry rather than site navigation, indicating no clear internal link structure was followed to deeper pages (About, Services, etc.). The 75% 'followed from fetched page' in metadata appears inconsistent with the trajectory, which shows only memory-typed URLs.
• ›Pricing is intentionally non-public: the site directs inquiries to a contact form rather than publishing tiers or models. The agent correctly identified this as custom/case-based pricing, grounded in site language ('Tell us about your case') rather than inference.
• ›Team and case study data are simply absent from the homepage content returned in steps [0]–[2]. The agent noted this gap clearly ('content is not included on the page') and suggested the About page as a likely source, but never fetched it—indicating either a navigation dead-end or agent limitation.
• ›Daubert AI is described in product terms but not in operational or pricing terms on the homepage; the agent flagged this as unclear without overreaching, correctly attributing the gap to site content rather than inventing details.
• ›The site is designed for human handoff: the core call-to-action is a case submission form requiring human judgment (litigation context), not self-service or agent-executable actions. This positions pricing and team credibility as sales-phase disclosures rather than pre-engagement transparency.