The agent retrieved core information about Tavistock Relationships' mission, services, and audience from two pages (homepage and therapy services page), but could not determine pricing despite the site's reference to a Fees page it did not fetch. The site was partially navigable — it surfaced the information needed to describe what TR does and who it serves, but withheld pricing and operational details behind unfetched links and unexplained logos.

• ›The site explicitly mentions a 'Fees' link on both the homepage and therapy page, but neither fetched page contained fee details; the agent identified this gap and correctly noted it should consult that page next. This is a common antipattern: pricing relegated to a subpage not linked in body copy.
• ›Accreditation logos (BACP, BPC, COSRT, UKCP) are displayed without explanation of what they mean for individual therapists or how they affect service quality — the site assumes reader familiarity rather than educating.
• ›The site's differentiators are asserted claims (long history, 90% recommendation rate without methodology) rather than comparative positioning; no alternatives are mentioned or acknowledged, limiting the agent's ability to explain 'how it's different' beyond historical longevity.
• ›Course dating is internally inconsistent on the fetched page ("Summer/Autumn 2026" heading vs. "11 January 2027" start date vs. "summer-27" in URLs), suggesting either outdated content or poor content governance; the agent flagged this but could not resolve it.
• ›The agent did not fetch the Fees page despite identifying it as the likely source of answer to a core task requirement (pricing); this represents a navigation limitation — the agent used typed-from-memory and link-following but did not exhaustively explore the site structure to answer pricing.