The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive explanation of FactuPro by fetching the homepage, pricing page, and blog comparison post directly from the site. The site was reasonably navigable once the agent discovered functional URLs through web search, though some standard navigation paths (e.g., /features, /pricing) returned 404s, forcing reliance on search-discovered URLs.

• ›Homepage [1] was content-bearing but truncated ('cut off mid-sentence'), yet still contained the core positioning (WhatsApp-first invoicing, target users, three pricing tiers). The agent did not re-fetch to complete it, relying instead on the pricing page [6] and blog [7] to fill gaps.
• ›Two direct navigation attempts ([2] /features, [3] /pricing) failed with 404s, indicating incomplete site structure or aggressive URL routing. The agent recovered by using search-discovered URLs instead, showing the site was not fully self-navigable.
• ›Pricing page [6] was the only source for transparent Starter and Standard pricing (€9.95/€19.95 monthly, €7.95/€15.95 annual); homepage [1] stated different figures (€7.95/€15.95 monthly). The agent correctly cited [6] as authoritative but did not flag the discrepancy.
• ›Blog post [7] directly compared FactuPro to Holded and Quipu, providing the differentiator narrative. This was the only site source that explicitly addressed 'how it's different' — a core task requirement — and was only discovered via web search, not site navigation.
• ›The agent identified three genuine gaps (Advanced pricing opacity, geographic limitation unclear, no side-by-side competitor table) based on what the site did NOT expose, not model assumptions. These reflect real navigability friction, not hallucination.