The agent successfully gathered core information about Heika's services, positioning, and pricing approach directly from the site homepage. However, the site itself lacks case studies, team bios, and explicit competitor positioning, forcing the agent to flag significant gaps in credibility markers that would normally help evaluate a software studio.

• ›All substantive facts came from a single page (heika.be/) fetched three times. The agent typed the URL from memory rather than discovering it through site navigation, indicating minimal internal site structure or navigation — the site appears to be a single-page or heavily consolidated design.
• ›Pricing information was present but deliberately opaque: the site explicitly states custom quoting after architecture phase but provides no rate examples, ranges, or case studies with budgets. The agent had to contact info to complete the picture.
• ›No portfolio, case studies, team bios, or founder background were published on the site. The agent correctly identified these as gaps but could not fill them from the domain itself — this is a credibility liability for a B2B software studio.
• ›The methodology (three-phase approach with architecture → development → support) was clearly articulated on the homepage, making it one of the few differentiators the site actively explained.
• ›The agent's final response accurately reflects the site's actual content: it is positioning-focused rather than proof-focused, relying on stated values (IP transfer, remote-first, methodical approach) rather than demonstrated outcomes.