The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive overview of WeDoWebsites by fetching the homepage four times and one cases page. The site surfaced core positioning, pricing tiers, and target audience directly, but lacked granular feature documentation and case-study details—gaps the agent identified rather than filled.

• ›The agent retrieved substantially the same homepage content four times (steps 0–3), suggesting either page caching or that the site's homepage did not expose deeper subpages; the agent did not discover a services, pricing detail, or FAQ page despite multiple visits.
• ›Pricing tiers and target audience were explicitly published on the homepage in Danish and English, making them directly extractable without inference.
• ›The cases page (step 5) listed 10 case study names with 'Se case' (View case) links but provided no summaries, industry tags, or metrics; the agent correctly noted this and did not over-claim details from individual case pages (which were not fetched).
• ›Competitive differentiation was derived entirely from homepage copy (20+ years, Danish operations, full-service model, tiered pricing); no third-party reviews, comparison pages, or competitor context was consulted, leaving relativity claims unvalidated.
• ›The agent flagged missing feature specificity, technology stack details, and a pricing calculator—all legitimate gaps not filled by retrieval, indicating honest boundary-setting rather than model hallucination to complete the picture.