Agent successfully assembled a comprehensive overview of Finfrog by relying entirely on web search and third-party sources, as the target domain's homepage was unreachable (202 response). The site does not publish its own product information in a directly fetchable form, forcing the agent to reconstruct the narrative from search snippets, Wikipedia, and competitor/review platforms.

• ›Direct access to finfrog.fr/homepage failed twice (202 status), indicating the site is either misconfigured or blocks automated crawling. The agent had no choice but to rely on external sources.
• ›Wikipedia and Trustpilot reviews emerged as the most substantive content sources, containing core facts about founding date, loan amounts, target demographics, and regulatory status—information the company should be publishing on its own site.
• ›Pricing details (6.84% max fees, 22.2% APR, €3 average monthly cost) came from third-party aggregator sites, not from Finfrog's own disclosed rates, creating a friction point where the agent had to qualify its answer with 'third-party sources rather than stated rates.'
• ›The February 2025 financing company license from ACPR was discoverable through search but represents a recent, material business change that would be critical for the homepage to highlight—its absence from the site (inaccessible as it was) leaves a significant positioning gap.
• ›Agent correctly identified gaps it could not fill (approval/default rates, international availability, peer-to-peer vs. institutional lending mechanics) rather than confabulating, showing appropriate epistemic caution.