Agent successfully assembled a usable overview of the business by fetching the homepage and seller services page, but the site lacks critical pricing transparency and credibility signals (zero-valued stats, no listings, no testimonials), forcing the agent to acknowledge gaps rather than fill them with guesses.

• ›The site publishes no seller commission rate or fee structure — only that buyer advisory is 'free' because sellers pay. The agent correctly identified this as the largest gap and did not speculate on the percentage.
• ›Homepage metrics ('0 families advised', '0 clients protected') appear to be uninitialized placeholders, which the agent caught and flagged as credibility-damaging rather than ignoring them.
• ›The 'Cierra con Garantía' (close with guarantee) is advertised on the homepage but never explained on the seller services page — the agent traced this broken promise and called it out explicitly.
• ›'Residencial Tulipanes' property link contains 'hotel-en-venta' in its URL, suggesting a labeling or categorization error that the agent noted without over-interpreting.
• ›The agent did not fetch individual listing pages, the contact form, or the Aura chatbot, and explicitly stated this limitation rather than claiming completeness — appropriate epistemic restraint for an open-ended evaluation task.