The agent fetched the single homepage, which carried essentially all the information, and produced a clear account of the practice's offerings, differentiators, and gaps, though it could not find pricing or client details. The site was navigable on one page but was thin on machine-readable commercial information, so the answer rested on one fetch processed through a summarizing layer.

• ›The entire site's content (offerings, prototypes, engineering notes, contact) was reachable from one fetched homepage with in-page anchors, so no navigation beyond the root was needed.
• ›Pricing, engagement models, target-customer profile, and case studies are absent from the site, leaving the core 'how it's priced' question unanswerable from the site.
• ›Founder background and specific engineering practices (HMAC webhook verification, LLM failover, atomic Redis rate limiting) are published concretely and give a credible differentiation story.
• ›The site contains a internal inconsistency ('Available worldwide' in footer vs. 'Open to international collaboration' in hero) and does not state team size, which the agent had to infer.
• ›The agent's caveat that the fetch was processed by a small model means specific wording should be verified against the live page, a reliability limit on the single-source answer.