Agent successfully gathered comprehensive explanatory information about 21Go by repeatedly fetching the homepage (all four steps returned different sections of the same domain). The site publishes key positioning, coverage, pricing structure, and differentiators directly on its main page, but does not expose fixed pricing, waiting periods, or geographic scope clearly—forcing the agent to identify gaps.

• ›All four fetches targeted 21go.online/ (homepage) via URL memory, not link discovery—the site's navigation structure was not used. The agent treated the homepage as a multi-faceted resource that could be queried multiple times, receiving different content sections each time, suggesting either dynamic content or the agent's model re-extracting different emphasis from the same page.
• ›Pricing information is intentionally abstracted: the site publishes the four plan tier names and a 6% FIPE participation rule, but declines to list example prices, instead directing users to a 2-minute simulator or WhatsApp contact. The agent correctly reported this as the site's design choice, not a failure to find the data.
• ›The regulatory and legal positioning (mutual association vs. insurance, SUSEP registration under Lei Complementar 213/2025, 'membership agreement' vs. 'policy') is published explicitly on the site and correctly extracted—this is core to understanding 21Go's market position and was well-surfaced.
• ›Geographic scope (Rio de Janeiro emphasis) is stated but ambiguity about national vs. regional operation remains unresolved; the site does not clarify service area clearly. The agent correctly flagged this as a genuine gap rather than assuming.
• ›The agent reached 75% of its information via link-following (but all links were back to the same homepage) and 25% via URL memory, indicating minimal discoverable internal navigation—the homepage appears to be the primary information hub.