The agent worked around the site's rate-limiting by relying entirely on web search results and snippets to construct an answer. It delivered a reasonably complete overview of Wayve's positioning, products, pricing, and differentiation, but could not access the actual site directly to verify details, confirm sizing/fit information, or explore features like 'The Wayve Collective' mentioned in navigation.

• ›The site aggressively rate-limited direct HTTP requests (429 errors on every fetch attempt), forcing the agent to rely on web search results and snippets rather than fetched page content. This made direct verification impossible.
• ›Search results were content-bearing: they contained product names, prices ($45–$94), material specs (GOTS organic cotton, RWS merino wool), and explicit competitive comparisons (Wayve vs Quince, Ryker, Alo Yoga) that the agent incorporated verbatim into the answer.
• ›The agent cited specific product pages and blog comparison articles in its sources but never actually fetched them—all substance came from search snippets, not from crawled page bodies. The site publishes comparison content (vs competitors) but only the snippet text was available to the agent.
• ›Critical gaps exist: sizing/fit guides, shipping costs, return policy details, and the meaning of 'The Wayve Collective' were not accessible via search results. The agent correctly flagged these as missing rather than inventing them, suggesting appropriate epistemic caution.
• ›The site is not agent-friendly: rate-limiting prevents direct inspection, and core information (certifications, detailed product specs, policies) appears to exist but was only surfaced via web search snippet fragments, not as structured data or llms.txt.