The agent successfully extracted Fidelo's core positioning, pricing, and claimed differentiators from two fetched pages. The site publishes pricing in structured tables and feature lists that were directly consumable, but several pricing ambiguities (setup fee range, band application mechanics, School Academy pricing) and feature details (emergency response scope, migration cost inclusion) remained unresolved despite the pages' apparent completeness—these gaps reflect the site's own presentation, not missing pages.

• ›Homepage and pricing page returned well-organized, quantitative data (pricing tables, feature lists, setup fee ranges) that directly populated the final answer with minimal interpretation required.
• ›A factual inconsistency was present in the site's own content: the homepage example (12 users at €650/month) did not match the pricing table (which would yield ~€480), and the agent correctly flagged this rather than resolving it via model reasoning.
• ›Critical pricing mechanics (whether band rates apply per-user or per-band, whether School Academy has its own table) were left ambiguous in the site's published content, forcing the agent to note incompleteness rather than guess—good fidelity to retrieved facts.
• ›The site named legacy migration sources (Class, Intrinsiq, Easymate, etc.) but did not publish a separate 'competitors' section or comparison table, so the agent correctly noted competitors were unnamed.
• ›Agent deliberately documented what was NOT checked (features, integrations, security, customer pages) rather than inferring from model memory, maintaining a clear audit trail of what the two fetched pages did and did not cover.