Agent successfully gathered enough information to explain UDB's mission, audience, positioning, and approximate pricing, but the official site did not publicly expose tuition costs or detailed program catalogs—requiring supplemental web search and third-party sources to fill those gaps.

• ›Official site (steps [2], [5]) provided mission, program types, philosophy, and campus info but did not list tuition or detailed program descriptions; agent had to search externally.
• ›Pricing data came entirely from third-party aggregators (step [6]), not from udb.edu.sv itself—the site directs students to contact admissions rather than publishing rates.
• ›Site navigation proved fragile: direct guesses at /programas and /admisiones returned 404s (steps [3], [4]), forcing reliance on the homepage and web search rather than internal site structure.
• ›Differentiators (Salesian identity, applied learning focus, multiple formats, accreditations) were discoverable from the homepage but not systematically organized—agent had to synthesize positioning from scattered mentions.
• ›Agent filled gaps (scholarship specifics, detailed major requirements, competitor comparisons) with model reasoning rather than retrieved facts, honestly calling these out as 'couldn't find' rather than fabricating.