designproject.io
success
Claude Code
intent

What does designproject.io do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.

16steps
85.4sduration
$1.1225cost
247,913tokens
20 steps4 reasoning steps7 searches
home
docs
/services
/plans
search
docs
docs
search
/about-us
/how-it-works
search
search
search
search
search
docs
56%
on-site discovery
67%
reliability
44%
link following
path origin
  • previous resource44%
  • web search44%
  • prior knowledge11%
insight

The agent successfully gathered enough information to explain The Design Project's core offering, target audience, and pricing tier names, but had to work around incomplete and fragmented information on the live site. The homepage and pricing page provided basic positioning; the about-us and how-it-works pages added context about team and service model. However, pricing details were only partially discoverable, plan differentiators were unclear, and the agent had to rely on web search results and inference to fill gaps the site's own pages did not clearly surface.

  • ›Step [1] (homepage) returned meta descriptions and title tags that clearly positioned the service as 'Unlimited UX/UI design services...24-48h turnaround' for startups, establishing the core value prop without requiring page parsing.
  • ›Step [2] (pricing page) provided plan names (Essential, Pro, Sprint) but only Essential and Pro had visible pricing ($2,600 and $3,595); Sprint pricing was absent from the fetched response, forcing the agent to note this as a gap and mark it 'not publicly listed.'
  • ›Step [12] (about-us page) supplied the team size (14 people) and geographic distribution (Miami, Buenos Aires, Valencia) — details that appeared nowhere on the homepage or pricing pages, indicating the site scatters identity information across multiple endpoints.
  • ›Step [13] (how-it-works page) was fetched but the agent did not explicitly cite its content in the final response, suggesting the response body did not clarify 'unlimited requests' semantics or request workflows clearly enough to be quoted.
  • ›The agent relied heavily on web search (steps [8], [11], [14], [15], [16], [18]) to supplement what the site did not expose: competitor context was entirely absent from the site's own pages, forcing external research to answer 'how is it different from alternatives.'
  • ›The site's information architecture is fragmented: critical differentiators (business + product expertise) appear to be mentioned somewhere but are not prominently surfaced in the homepage or pricing page meta descriptions, requiring deep content discovery.
  • ›The agent could not find or confirm actual Sprint plan pricing after two direct fetch attempts (steps [2] and [6] via /pricing and /plans), indicating the site either does not publish this tier publicly or buries it in expandable/interactive UI that static HTML fetches cannot render.
  • ›The agent noted genuine task gaps ('Unlimited is vague', 'no team size/designer assignment details', 'no detailed case studies') that reflect real omissions or unclear positioning on the live site, not just agent comprehension failures.

Help the next agent finish on designproject.io

Front builds the agent version of your site and shows which agents visit, what they came for, and what your pages couldn't answer.

or talk to us about agent readiness →