The agent gathered a partial but incomplete understanding of new.blanket.eu by relying heavily on prior knowledge and web search rather than the site itself. Direct fetches of new.blanket.eu returned client-side rendered React shells with no meaningful content, forcing the agent to piece together an answer from the main blanket.eu site and search results. The agent successfully identified Blank& as a Finnish CBD skincare brand and described products, positioning, and pricing, but could not explain the purpose or distinction of new.blanket.eu itself—a core ambiguity that remains unresolved.

• ›new.blanket.eu fetches ([1], [5], [10], [17], [27]) returned truncated HTML with no readable content; all meaningful product information, pricing, and positioning came from blanket.eu or web search, not from new.blanket.eu itself.
• ›The agent correctly identified that new.blanket.eu uses 'RubikC' technology (seen in preload tags and image paths) while blanket.eu uses Shopify, but the site provides no explanation of this technical difference or why two domains exist.
• ›Pricing information had to be sourced entirely from web search results and inferred from blanket.eu; new.blanket.eu's client-side rendering made prices invisible in raw fetches, and no dedicated pricing page exists (404 on /pricing).
• ›Standard navigation paths failed: /about (404), /pricing (404), /pages/retailers (404 on new.blanket.eu). The agent had to use the sitemap to discover product pages and fall back to the main blanket.eu site and search for business model details.
• ›The distinction between new.blanket.eu and blanket.eu—whether it's a regional variant, B2B portal, platform migration, or market test—is not documented anywhere on either site; the agent could only speculate.