The agent assembled a partial but useful overview of mjop-maker.nl by combining truncated on-site metadata with external research, but could not access the site's full content to verify methodology or detailed service differentiation. The core business model (€399 fixed-price MJOP for small VvEs without on-site inspection) was extracted from page titles and meta descriptions, but how they achieve this without inspection remained unexplained because the homepage HTML was truncated. The agent had to rely heavily on web search and competitive intelligence to answer the question, since the site itself did not publish comprehensive, machine-readable explanations.

• ›On-site fetches (steps 1, 4, 6, 10, 12) returned only HTML metadata and truncated body content; no full methodology or service description was accessible. The agent relied on page titles and meta descriptions like 'Geen offertetraject en geen inspecteur over de vloer' to infer positioning.
• ›Pricing (€399) and target audience (2-12 apartments) were discoverable from the homepage meta description in step [1], but what's actually included, how they avoid inspection requirements, and qualification criteria were not explained on any accessible page.
• ›The agent's competitive analysis and market positioning came entirely from external sources (steps 14, 15, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27): articles about MJOP-maker criticism, competitor pricing guides, and market overviews. The site itself published no comparison page, 'why choose us' section, or competitor positioning.
• ›A critical red flag—the article 'MJOP-maker zaait angst bij VvE's' (step 17)—was discovered via web search but the full content was not readable, leaving the agent unable to explain what concerns have been raised about the service.
• ›The site is minimally agent-ready: it exposes only surface-level metadata and has a sparse, truncated information architecture. The agent had to guess at page URLs (step 3 guessed /hoe-het-werkt and received 404), and had to piece together understanding from external sources rather than the site's own documentation.