The agent successfully gathered what Sorted.fast does, who it's for, and how it differs from alternatives by assembling information from the homepage, API endpoint, documentation pages, and machine-readable artifacts (llms.txt, agents.md, auth.md, docs.md). However, the agent explicitly failed to retrieve complete pricing details despite locating the pricing page—the HTML was fetched but not parsed into the final answer, leaving pricing as a significant gap marked as 'hidden behind an HTML page I couldn't fully read.' The site is moderately agent-ready: it publishes positioning in Markdown and JSON formats, but critical pricing information was not available in machine-readable form.

• ›The homepage (step [1]) and API endpoint (step [4]) returned HTML and JSON describing Sorted as a high-concurrency event registration platform, but neither contained pricing detail—only the tagline about platform fees was visible.
• ›Machine-readable artifacts (llms.txt [8], agents.md [14], auth.md [16], docs.md [14]) provided the clearest positioning: event registration for extreme concurrency, agent-first design with MCP, API-key auth, and that agents don't pay. These were the content sources used to build the 'what' and 'who' answers.
• ›The pricing page (step [9], /docs/pricing) returned a 200 HTML response but the agent could not extract the actual fee structure, percentage, or thresholds from it—indicating the site surfaces pricing as visual/interactive HTML rather than in a fetch-friendly text or JSON format.
• ›Documentation pages (step [11] /docs/events, step [12] /docs/agents, step [19] /docs/classes, step [20] /docs/mcp-setup) provided feature details (waitlists, capacity, Stripe payments, iframe embeds, MCP setup) but were not directly cited in the final answer; the agent relied instead on aggregated positioning from agents.md and llms.txt.
• ›The agent probed well-known artifact paths (llms.txt, agents.md, auth.md, sitemap.xml) and found most; pricing.md returned 404, forcing reliance on the HTML page, which proved opaque.
• ›Web search (steps [13], [17]) returned results for unrelated products (sorted.com, Capterra, other 'Sorted' products) and did not help resolve the pricing gap, indicating sorted.fast is not yet high-visibility in SERPs.