The agent read the homepage and the webdesign service page, and both returned substantive, fetchable content that let it explain the agency's services, audience, pricing, and differentiators. It could not read /apps or /ratgeber, which were only linked, and it openly flagged those and other gaps such as the unexplained GEO term and unsupported rating/client claims.

• ›Homepage and /leistung/webdesign were fetched as clean, well-structured text that directly answered pricing, timeline, process, and stack questions.
• ›The agent reached the service page by following a link from the homepage, so the site's own navigation surfaced the key pricing detail.
• ›/apps and /ratgeber were linked from navigation but never fetched, leaving those offerings undescribed.
• ›Print, SEO/GEO, maintenance, and TAUNUSBOX pricing were absent from both fetched pages, so the answer has acknowledged gaps there.
• ›No competitor comparison exists on the site; the 'how it differs' answer relies on the agency's own self-positioning.