The agent assembled a partial but usable overview of Condor by fetching the homepage and supplementing it with web search results on baggage policy and competitor comparisons. The primary site provided navigation structure and high-level positioning; critical fare details (baggage inclusions by tier) came from third-party sources because a direct Condor page returned 404, and pricing freshness / currency inconsistencies on the site itself created ambiguity.

• ›The homepage alone provided Condor's broad positioning, navigation menu, and pricing ranges, but did not clearly document the contents of each fare tier (Zero/Classic/Choice/Flex). The agent had to rely on search results and third-party baggage guides to flesh out this core comparison.
• ›Step [1] (Economy Class page) failed with 404, forcing the agent to source baggage details from external third-party guides rather than from Condor's official documentation.
• ›The homepage mixed currency displays (EUR and USD in different links), which the agent flagged as a source of confusion; the site did not provide a clear, consistent fare table.
• ›The agent correctly identified that it could not verify Lufthansa details from search results and advised the user to confirm on Lufthansa's own site, showing appropriate epistemic caution about incomplete competitor data.
• ›No structured data (JSON-LD) or machine-readable fare/baggage schema was mentioned in the homepage content, forcing manual assembly of the answer from prose and navigation links.