The agent successfully gathered the core product story, pricing model, and stated differentiators from three key pages (homepage, pricing, about). The site exposed enough to explain Kestrel's workflow and positioning, but left critical gaps (trial length, post-trial behavior, paid pricing, definition of internal terms) unfilled, requiring the agent to flag what was missing rather than infer.

• ›The homepage [0] directly stated the product, workflow, pricing (free trial, no card required), and key limits in prose form — no structured data, requiring parsing. The agent extracted this content verbatim and accurately.
• ›The pricing page [2] confirmed the free trial model but explicitly stated 'Pricing for a future service has not been set,' making clear that no paid plans exist yet. This directly answered 'how it's priced' with a hard boundary the site itself draws.
• ›The about page [3] added context ('early product on a managed staging address') that explained the incompleteness — the site itself signals it is pre-production, so gaps in trial length and post-trial terms are not omissions but reflect actual product state.
• ›The site uses domain 'shelfsignal-fdd3c0.cofounder.company' but calls the product 'Kestrel' with no explanation of the relationship. The agent noted this as confusing because the site never clarifies it; the agent did not assume or explain it.
• ›The agent did not fetch docs, contact, or privacy pages [1 acknowledged this explicitly], stopping after identifying that the three main pages did not answer all questions. This was a sound boundary: those pages were discoverable but not fetched, so absent information could not be attributed to the site.