The agent gathered a coherent overview of Instilla's positioning, services, and client base from the homepage alone, but encountered a navigation-hostile site with broken redirects and no pricing transparency. The final answer is substantially complete for what the site publicly exposes, though gaps (pricing, engagement models, technical specifics) reflect deliberate information withholding rather than agent failure.

• ›Steps [2], [3], [7] all triggered HTTP 301 redirects that then returned 404s — the site's internal navigation structure is broken for common intent paths (services, about, pricing), forcing the agent to rely entirely on the homepage.
• ›The homepage (steps [1] and [6]) was comprehensive enough to answer most of the task: it explicitly lists four service pillars, names proprietary tools (Rank, Elara, Intuito), cites recognizable client brands, and articulates differentiation (GEO Company, strategy+implementation, proprietary tech). The agent did not need to excavate deeper.
• ›Pricing is genuinely absent from the site—not hidden behind a login or paywall, just not published. The agent correctly identified this as a business decision (custom project basis), not a navigation failure.
• ›The agent filled identified gaps ('How they're different', 'Confusing elements') by applying general knowledge of agency business models and competitive positioning, not from the site—a pragmatic choice given the site's minimal content and broken structure.
• ›75% of navigation came from following links, but the two high-value fetches (homepage at [1] and [6]) account for all substantive answers; the failed redirects at [2], [3], [7] and 404s at [4], [5], [8] added no new information and illustrate poor site architecture.