The agent retrieved and summarized Bank of America's consumer and small business offerings from three accessible pages (homepage, small business, deposits), but encountered access barriers (HTTP 405 on checking, 404 on Preferred Rewards) and could not verify competitor comparisons from the site itself. The final answer is partial: pricing and features are fragmentary, tier details are incomplete, and the comparative positioning rests on model memory rather than site research.

• ›The deposits overview page [5] was the only source that provided structured pricing data (account fees, APY, overdraft fees, waiver thresholds). The homepage [0] and small business page [3] intentionally hide fee and rate information behind links or omit it entirely, forcing users into deeper navigation.
• ›Two critical pages failed to fetch: the dedicated checking product page returned HTTP 405 (Method Not Allowed), and the Preferred Rewards details page returned 404, both of which were guessed URLs [2, 6] rather than discovered by following site links. This indicates the site does not surface these key resources in a discoverable way.
• ›The small business page [3] presents conflicting information (Commercial & Corporations threshold stated as both 'more than $50M' and '$50M to $2B') and inconsistent product lists across menu sections, making it difficult for the agent to extract a coherent feature inventory.
• ›The agent's comparative analysis ('how it's different from alternatives') draws entirely from model memory: the site provides no competitor research, comparisons, or explicit positioning statements. The agent explicitly states this limitation in the final response.
• ›The homepage [0] prioritizes an app-download modal over product content, leading with conversion mechanics rather than information architecture. Sign-in, navigation clarity, and accessibility (empty alt text on images) issues were identified but not resolved by any fetched page.