The agent assembled a partial but usable overview of the RCA by combining the homepage, About page, and search snippets of programme-specific fee pages. Pricing information was fragmented across individual programme pages with inconsistent year labels; the dedicated fees page returned 503 (unavailable), forcing reliance on search results rather than a single authoritative source.

• ›Step [0] (homepage) provided core identity facts (postgraduate specialist, three schools, industry partnerships, QS ranking claim), but was truncated mid-output, requiring the agent to infer completeness and follow up on missing details.
• ›Step [3] (About page) confirmed institutional type and history but did not provide fees, student numbers, or mission statement; the site itself linked to those pages without embedding them, creating fragmentation.
• ›Step [1] (fees page) returned 503 Service Unavailable, blocking direct access to fee information. The agent pivoted to web search (step [4]), which surfaced programme-specific pages with fees, but each carried different entry-year labels or no label, creating ambiguity about which figures applied to 2026/27.
• ›The final answer cites seven sources but only three were fetched tool calls ([0], [3], and search results from [4]). The search results themselves contained the substance of the pricing section rather than the search acting as a router—they included inline fee data from RCA programme pages that were not directly fetched.
• ›The agent explicitly called out gaps: no international fees found, no single 2026/27 fee table, no mission statement, no staff/student headcount, and unclear undergraduate offer. These gaps were not due to agent error but reflect either missing site content or pages that returned errors or failed to load.