The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive overview of Wiley Online Library by working around direct site access blocks, relying entirely on web search results and external sources. The site itself was not navigable via fetch, forcing the agent to reconstruct its positioning, pricing, and competitive stance from search snippets and third-party library descriptions.

• ›All four content-bearing steps (7–10) were web search results, not fetches from onlinelibrary.wiley.com itself. The domain blocked direct access with 403 errors on every attempted URL ([1]–[5]), making the site effectively opaque to agent navigation.
• ›Pricing information came only from search result titles and external references (e.g., 'Price Lists - Librarians' URLs) that pointed to pages the agent could not fetch. The final answer correctly identifies this as a gap—pricing details are not publicly surfaced on the site.
• ›Competitive positioning (vs. JSTOR, ScienceDirect) was inferred from aggregate search results and third-party comparison sites, not from Wiley's own content. The agent had no site-authored differentiation statement to draw from.
• ›The agent correctly cited sources in its final response, all pointing to URLs it could not directly retrieve—a proxy strategy relying on search engine snippet previews and titles rather than page content.
• ›The agent's self-awareness about friction ('this is somewhat typical in the academic publishing industry but makes it hard for individuals to understand') appears to be model memory applied to the discovered gaps, not extracted from any fetched source.