The agent assembled a reasonably complete overview of Planungsbüro Graw's business by visiting the homepage, services, about, and specific TGA planning pages. However, the site does not publish pricing information in a machine-readable or even human-visible form, forcing the agent to rely on prior knowledge of German HOAI standards and industry norms to answer the 'how it's priced' question. The site is moderately navigable but requires guessing at URLs and prior domain knowledge to fill critical gaps.

• ›Step [1] (homepage) and step [15] (services overview) provided the core business description—TGA planning, energy concepts, BIM, and renewable energy integration—via page titles and meta descriptions that were readily accessible.
• ›Step [14] (about page) and step [20] (TGA-specific services) supplied company age (30+ years), team size (30+ staff), and service scope (HOAI-compliant planning phases), but the agent had to infer HOAI percentage-fee norms from prior knowledge because the site never states actual rates or fee structures.
• ›The agent successfully guessed URLs like /leistungen and /unternehmen but failed on /technische-gebaeudeausruestung at the root level (404 in step [7]), requiring the agent to discover the correct nested path (/leistungen/technische-gebaeudeausruestung in step [20]) via web search results, not site navigation.
• ›Pricing and competitive differentiation were largely absent from the fetched pages; the agent compensated by noting the site's emphasis on free initial consultations and post-commissioning support, and by drawing on industry knowledge to contrast Graw with larger firms—a layer of inference not grounded in site content.
• ›The site's lack of pricing transparency, geographic scope clarity, and explicit competitor comparison means a human evaluator cannot easily verify the agent's final answer against site-stated facts; much of the 'how it's different' section relies on tone and implication rather than explicit claims.