The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive explanation of Medusa by combining fetches from the official marketing site (medusajs.com), documentation, and third-party comparison articles. The official site itself was minimally agent-readable—the agent had to rely heavily on web search to discover the actual medusajs.com domain (the requested medusajs.co was for sale), and then cross-reference external sources to fill gaps on pricing details, differentiators, and use cases that weren't fully explicit on the primary site.

• ›The official site (steps [7], [8]) returned valid HTML but the fetches were heavily truncated in the trajectory log, making it unclear what marketing copy or structured data was actually extracted. The agent cited medusajs.com/pricing as a source but the pricing page fetch also truncated; the final response's pricing tiers came from external sources (steps [12], [13], [15]), not from the official pricing page.
• ›The agent discovered the correct domain (medusajs.com vs. the broken medusajs.co) entirely through web search (step [4], [5], [14]), not through site navigation or intelligent routing. This indicates the requested domain was not only unavailable but a dead-end—the site itself did not surface a redirect or canonical link to guide discovery.
• ›Critical information gaps required external sources: Medusa vs. Shopify/WooCommerce comparison (step [15] from Rigby Blog), implementation details and modular architecture (steps [12], [13] from Netguru and Elsner), and detailed pricing structure (inferred from multiple third-party reviews). The official site does not appear to contain a competitive comparison matrix or detailed feature breakdown.
• ›The agent's final answer includes a transparent caveat about cloud pricing opacity ('lacks transparency'), indicating it could not extract full usage-based cost details even from the official pricing page—a genuine navigability friction point on the canonical site.
• ›Documentation site (step [11], docs.medusajs.com) was fetched but not cited as a source in the final response, suggesting either it was too technical for the task or the agent relied more on marketing-focused third-party summaries.