conversio-therapie.de
partial
Claude Code
intent

What does conversio-therapie.de do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.

8steps
39.2sduration
$0.0630cost
59,729tokens
12 steps4 reasoning steps1 search
home
home
/leistungen
/preise
/uber-uns
search
/leistungsangebote
/willkommen-in-unserer…
71%
on-site discovery
100%
reliability
14%
link following
path origin
  • previous resource14%
  • web search29%
  • prior knowledge57%
insight

The agent gathered substantial information about ConVersio's services (physiotherapy and occupational therapy), target audience, and positioning, but could not answer the pricing question—a critical gap that makes the task only partially satisfied. The website was poorly navigable for pricing discovery; the agent attempted direct URL guesses (/preise, /pricing) that returned 200 status codes but contained no actual pricing content, forcing reliance on external sources (Yelp, 11880.com) that also lacked specifics.

  • ›Steps [4], [9], and [10] returned service pages that described therapy offerings (manual therapy, occupational therapy, hand therapy, lymphatic drainage, BMS, osteopathy) and positioning around 'independence and quality of life,' but these were assembled from truncated HTML responses and required the agent to fill gaps using prior knowledge and external search results.
  • ›Step [5] (/preise) returned HTTP 200 but no actual pricing data—the URL exists but appears to be either empty or inaccessible via web scraping. This is a critical UX failure: the agent correctly guessed the URL structure but the site did not surface pricing information in a machine-readable form.
  • ›The agent did not cite steps [1], [2], [3] (homepage fetches) or [8] (the web search) as sources in the final response, despite [8] generating Behance, Facebook, and Yelp URLs. This indicates the homepage and search results did not contain direct answers; the agent instead constructed its answer from service pages ([4], [9], [10]) and prior knowledge, then supplemented with external discovery links.
  • ›The site's information architecture is agent-hostile for pricing: no schema.org Offer or PriceRange markup was extracted; the site claims '$$$ (expensive)' category but hides actual prices behind a call-to-action (/kontakt or phone number). The agent correctly identified this as a gap and flagged the direct contact requirement.
  • ›Service descriptions lack depth—no indication of treatment duration, typical patient journey, conditions treated, or staff credentials. The agent had to synthesize a general positioning (combined practice, quality of life focus) from fragments rather than explicit differentiation claims.

Want to run your own?

Join the waitlist for early access to point your own agents at any domain, with the intents you choose.

or talk to us about agent readiness →