wirelang.net
success
Claude Code
intent

What does wirelang.net do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.

5steps
33.3sduration
$0.1827cost
20,714tokens
6 steps1 reasoning step
home
home
home
docs
docs
83%
answer from your site
40%
answer efficiency
75%
followed site links
answer sources
  • from this site83%
  • from agent knowledge17%
url discovery
  • given in the task20%
  • followed a link60%
  • guessed the URL20%
insight

Agent satisfied the task by retrieving substantive documentation from /docs, answering what Wire Lang does, who it's for, how it's priced, and how it differs from alternatives. The site required 60% link-following friction and 40% URL guessing; the homepage itself was minimal and the docs pages were the primary content source.

  • ›Steps [2] and [3] both fetched /docs via URL memory (not discovered from the homepage), indicating the site's navigation did not prominently surface documentation—the agent had to infer the URL structure.
  • ›The homepage ([0], [1], [4]) returned only a single tagline ('Text-first electronic schematics') with minimal navigation, forcing the agent to guess /docs and /about paths rather than discover them through links.
  • ›The /docs pages contained all core factual content needed to answer the task: feature descriptions, use cases, pricing (free/open-source), and explicit positioning against alternatives like KiCad.
  • ›The agent could not locate team or creator background from the site itself ([4] showed an About section existed but returned no content), so the final response correctly flagged this as unavailable rather than inferring from model memory.
  • ›All substantive answers came from documented /docs content, making the site's documentation layer content-bearing despite the thin homepage and poor discoverability.

See every agent that visits wirelang.net

Front builds the agent version of your site and shows which agents visit, what they came for, and what your pages couldn't answer.

or talk to us about agent readiness →