The agent retrieved and synthesized information from the homepage and limitations page to construct a complete overview of Legatus's service, target users, technical design, and limitations. The site was navigable but deliberately minimal: it published the core facts but omitted pricing, competitor context, and operational details (admin vetting, jurisdiction support, nominee replacement flows), requiring the agent to flag these as gaps rather than fill them from model memory.

• ›Pricing is stated only obliquely ('free service with no subscription revenue' on the limitations page), not on a dedicated pricing or product page; the agent correctly identified this as a data gap rather than inferring a price tier.
• ›The site explicitly documents its own structural weaknesses (coercion, nominee collusion, manual certificate review, no audit), which the agent retrieved directly from the limitations page—transparency that aids understanding but raises trust questions.
• ›The homepage and limitations page together form the complete published answer, but lack integration: gate sequences are described inconsistently across pages, and the limitations page contains pricing information that should anchor the homepage.
• ›The agent discovered both pages by memory-typed URL for the homepage and link-following for limitations; no search was needed, suggesting the site structure is simple but the information architecture is fragmented.
• ›The agent explicitly noted what it did NOT check (how-it-works, learn, privacy/terms pages) and acknowledged the final answer may be incomplete, demonstrating appropriate epistemic restraint rather than filling gaps with model memory.