The agent answered the task fully by reading the homepage, how-it-works, and for-employers pages, which together described the product, audience, and a 7% fee not visible on the homepage. The site was navigable through internal links, though pricing, deposit, and verification details were thin or absent, leaving several gaps the agent correctly flagged.

• ›Core product, audience, and process were published in plain text on the homepage and linked subpages, making the answer directly retrievable without guessing.
• ›The only explicit fee figure (7% on top of host price) appears solely on the employer page, not the homepage, so a reader of the main page would wrongly conclude there are no fees.
• ›Pricing, deposit amounts, cancellation, refund and dispute handling, and the meaning of 'verified' are absent from the fetched pages, requiring the agent to report them as unknown.
• ›No machine-readable or dedicated pricing/FAQ endpoint was surfaced; the agent relied on rendered marketing copy and a #faqs anchor it could not expand.
• ›The agent's comparison against alternatives relied entirely on the site's own competitor framing, since no independent comparison content was available.