The agent successfully understood Tokokino by assembling information from the homepage, GitHub repository, and README file. The official website itself is minimally informative (a single-page app with truncated HTML), forcing the agent to rely on the GitHub repository and README as the primary content sources. Despite navigation friction on tokokino.com itself, the agent found enough information to explain what Tokokino does, who it's for, how it's priced, and how it differs from alternatives.

• ›Step [1] (homepage) returned HTML but was heavily truncated and appeared to be a single-page app with minimal visible text content; the agent could not extract substantive information from it directly.
• ›Step [7] (GitHub repository) provided the critical source: it linked to the README which contained all substantive product information (features, tech stack, purpose). This was not surfaced by tokokino.com itself.
• ›Step [9] (raw README.md) was the only content-bearing artifact containing explicit product details (device mockups, animations, export formats, open-source license, tech stack). Tokokino.com does not publish this information in an agent-readable form.
• ›The agent's final answer cited two sources explicitly: the tokokino.com homepage (which provided minimal information) and the GitHub repository (which provided nearly all actionable information). The site does not self-document its own offering.
• ›Search steps [6], [10], [11], [12] were routers that helped the agent discover the GitHub repository but did not contribute content directly to the final answer. Pricing and features information had to be inferred from the GitHub README, not from the official site.